Assalamualaikum... nak tau x?? ari ni me n my classmates dah x bleh bg alasan nak tangguh quiz lg... akirnye Mr Bel tulis soalan quiz 2 kat whiteboard....
Kami pown dgan lmah smangat kluarkn paper dr beg msg2... waaa.... da la lgsung x bca pape smalam... confiden la kononnye lock alarm kul 5... nak buat revision.... tau2 bngun kul 8.11... seb bek kelas stat kul 9... dgn iron bju g, x mndi g.... nseb bek pkai jubah hitam... x nmpak kedut sgt...
Btw... soalan dia brkaitn dgn Chan v Little Toys Co.. Si Chan ni mmg penggemar online toys... Little Toys nie kluarkn advertisement nak jual limited edition robots dgn harga RM 150... si Chan ni pown isi la online form 2... dia diinformkn esok akn dpat dat toy... tp tiba2 wakil dr company 2 call ckap it can't be delivered coz the actual price is RM 1500... they'd done a mistake.. tp, Chan still insists on buying that toy with RM 150...
So, the question is, whether there is a binding contract or not....
Fush.... pening seyh... tgk org sebelah pown blurr giler... luckily it's an open book exam... i2 la untung jdi law students... tp susah mcm pe g... rujuk pown juz utk cari kes yg kna apply... nak dkat 15 minit bru dpat issue... and bla3..... last2 I confirmedkan dat it was only an Invitation To Treat.... and there's no binding contract.... I used Pharmaceutical v Boots as my example case...
brape la markah yg sy dpat... masuk dlm mrkh final plak 2... Mr Bel btau td lpas dah submit paper 2 dat ade yg dpat only 2 marks out of 10.... stakat nie rmai dpat 4 je n da highest is 5... tp time 2 dia x tnda rmai lg...
so, wish me gud luck!! salam...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
u tell me this already if i was not mistaken....
ReplyDelete